Who it's for
Businesses that want an honest read on their technology without committing to a full review. Often that is
a founder who suspects something is wrong but cannot yet name it, a board that wants a second opinion before
approving a large spend, or an investor taking an early look at a company before deciding whether deeper
diligence is worth the money.
It is also the sensible option when the answer might be "nothing serious". Paying for a full review to be
told your platform is fine is an expensive way to get good news.
How it works
We use AI to do the groundwork that would otherwise take a consultant a fortnight: reading the codebase,
mapping dependencies and their known vulnerabilities, checking the cloud configuration, and reading the git
history and issue tracker for how the team actually works. That is the part machines are genuinely good at,
and it is why this costs a fraction of the full review.
A partner then reviews everything the analysis produces before it reaches you, discounting the false
positives and deciding what actually matters at your stage. No finding is sent without a partner having read
it and stood behind it.
What is involved for you
Three touchpoints, and not much of your time.
A thirty-minute call to start. Enough for us to understand the business, what the platform is for,
and what you are worried about. Context changes which findings matter.
Then we run the analysis and produce the report, with a partner reviewing every finding before it
goes anywhere.
An hour to go through it. We walk you through the main findings, you ask whatever you want about
them, and we tell you which ones we would act on first.
What you get
A written report with an overall risk score and a scored breakdown across security, dependencies,
engineering health, infrastructure, scalability, licensing, process, code quality and documentation. Every
finding is graded, evidenced, and paired with the steps to fix it.
It does not analyse what you spend. Cost is part of the full health check, not this one.
You also get an honest statement of confidence. Where the analysis is firm, we say so. Where it points at
something that needs a human to dig further, we say that too, rather than dressing up a maybe as a finding.
Where it stops
This is the difference worth understanding before you buy. Essentials reads your systems; the full health
check reads your organisation. It does not include the interviews across engineering and the business, and
that matters, because delivery problems are usually human before they are technical. A tool can see that
releases keep slipping. It cannot see that two teams have been quietly disagreeing about ownership since
February.
So if you already know the problem is organisational, go straight to the
full Technology Health Check. If you want to know whether you have a problem
at all, start here.
What it costs, and what happens next
£2,000 plus VAT, fixed, whatever we find. If the report shows you need the full review, the fee for
Essentials comes off it, so starting here costs you nothing if you go further.